Error.
Admissions Committee Rubric
You will be assessed in four areas. Scoring below the indicated passing score will result in deferment.
- Writing Development: Passing score: 48
- Language Use: Passing score: 29
- Response Content: Passing score: 59
- Professional Behaviors: Passing score: 16
Writing Sample Portion
Writing Development
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality & Development of Ideas (x5) |
There is 1 clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out & is supported by detailed information |
Main idea is clear, but the supporting information is general. |
Main idea is somewhat clear, but there is need for more supporting information. Some info not connected to main idea. |
The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information |
The main idea is confusing. There is a lack of collected information |
Organization, relevance (x5) |
Proper paragraphing, support & elaboration of ideas, flow of thought, and focus all present |
Paper contains 3 elements of organization, though relevance is maintained |
Paper contains only 1 or 2 elements of organization, &/or relevance is lost |
None of the elements of organization are present, little or no relevance |
None of the elements of organization are present, there is no relevance |
Wording & Phrasing (x3)
|
Writer chooses variety of words to appropriately convey thoughts; proper phrasing |
Writer uses some variety in wording; or 1–2 phrasing changes would improve paper |
Little variety in word choice; or some awkward phrasing makes paper less reader-friendly |
Words non-descript, boring; or phrasing makes ideas in paper hard to decipher |
Wording and phrasing makes ideas in paper impossible to decipher |
Language Use
| 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grammar (x2) |
Writer makes no mistakes in grammar |
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar |
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar |
Writer makes 5-6 errors in grammar |
Writer makes more than 7 errors in grammar |
Sentence Structure (Syntax) (x 2) |
Writer makes no errors in syntax |
Writer makes 1-2 errors in syntax |
Writer makes 3-4 errors in syntax |
Writer makes 5-6 errors in syntax |
Writer makes more than 7 errors in syntax |
Punctuation (x 2) |
Writer makes no errors in punctuation |
Writer makes 1-2 errors in punctuation |
Writer makes 3-4 errors in punctuation |
Writer makes 5-6 errors in punctuation |
Writer makes more than 7 errors in punctuation |
Spelling (x 2) |
Writer makes no spelling errors |
Writer makes 1-2 spelling errors |
Writer makes 3-4 spelling errors |
Writer makes 5-6 spelling errors |
Writer makes more than 7 spelling errors |
Interview Portion
Response Content
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality & Development of Ideas (x4) |
Speaker reveals relevant information, telling, quality details giving important information beyond the obvious |
Supporting details & information are relevant, but 1 key issue or portion is unsupported |
Some details & information are relevant, but several key issues or portions are unsupported |
Supporting details & information are unclear or not related to the topic |
Supporting details & information are confusing and unrelated to the topic |
Organization & Relevance (x4) |
Topic & ideas are clearly stated & developed; specific examples are appropriate and relevant, & conclusion is clear |
Most information presented in logical sequence; generally well-thought out |
Topic & ideas are loosely connected; lacks relevance & or flow |
Choppy & disjointed; thoughts do not flow; development of ideas vague, random, no apparent logical order |
Topic & Ideas are unrelated, lack of development of ideas |
Wording & Phrasing (x4) |
Student uses a clear voice; proper volume & articulation; No mispronunciations |
Clear articulation but not as polished; pronounces most words correctly One mispronunciations |
Some mumbling; uneven rate; little or no expression; some colloquial speech, 2-3 mispronunciations |
Inaudible or too loud; too fast or too slow; seems uninterested &/or monotone; improper wording or phrasing, 4 or more mispronunciations |
Indecipherable speech, confusing wording and phrasing |
Grammar (x4)
|
No errors in grammar |
One error in grammar |
2-3 grammar errors |
More than 4 grammar errors |
Speech patterns are clearly unacceptable |
Professional Behaviors
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Non-verbal Cues (x1) |
Student maintains eye contact, seems comfortable; no anxiety-causing mannerisms |
Student maintains eye contact most of the time, but frequently looks away; some anxiety visible |
Student occasionally uses eye contact, but voice is low & student is clearly uncomfortable |
Student is very uncomfortable, inappropriate behaviors such as rocking; squirming in chair |
High anxiety! Student leaves the room & vocalizes intent of giving up trying to be a teacher. |
Poise (x2) |
Student composed; delivery smooth; tough questions do not “rattle” student |
Student composed; delivery fairly smooth; student only “rattled” once |
Student delivery somewhat rough; “rattled” more than once |
Student delivery rough; easily “rattled |
Student constantly “rattled,” never able to relax |
Appearance (x1) |
Very professional appearance; clean, neat, well-groomed, properly dressed for interview |
Clean & neat; well-groomed. underdressed for interview |
Fairly clean & neat; somewhat groomed; underdressed for interview |
Some evidence of an attempt to be neat and clean, underdressed for interview |
Appearance not professional |
